COMPARISON

Cetrorelix vs Leuprolide

5 attributes held for at least one of the two. 5 differ. Each value carries the register it came from and the date that register was read.

Answer

Cetrorelix is authorised or registered in 10 and Leuprolide in 8 of the 10 registers read. Cetrorelix: No trial states a phase. Leuprolide: highest phase Phase 3 (2 phase 3 trials, 0 with posted results). 6 registered trials include both.

States no view on which is preferable, safer or more effective. Not medical advice.

CetrorelixLeuprolide
Registered trials
differs
140
clinicaltrials.gov · 2026-10-03
520
clinicaltrials.gov · 2026-10-03
FDA label
differs
FDA-approved: cetrorelix acetate
openfda · 2026-10-03T17:23:44.062Z
FDA-approved: Vabrinty
openfda · 2026-10-03T17:23:44.062Z
EU authorisation
differs
Authorised
ema · 2026-10-03
Nothing on record
ema read 2026-08-31
EU authorised on
differs
1999-04-12
ema · 2026-10-03
Not checked
no record of "authorisedOn" for leuprolide
ATC code
differs
H01CC02
ema · 2026-10-03
Not checked
no record of "atcCode" for leuprolide

SIDE EFFECTS

Most common side effects, each beside its own placebo

Side effectCetrorelixplaceboLeuprolideplacebo
Back pain6.2%6.4%17.0%15.3%
Hypertension4.7%5.5%16.4%15.1%
Arthralgia4.2%4.6%27.5%20.9%
Nasopharyngitis8.9%8.7%--
Injection site pain8.5%3.7%--
Headache7.3%7.3%--
Upper respiratory infection6.9%6.0%--
Diarrhea6.0%2.8%--
Musculoskeletal pain6.0%2.8%--
PSA increased5.6%2.3%--
Hot flush--68.8%57.3%
Fatigue--42.8%32.8%
Fall--20.4%14.1%
Diarrhoea--13.9%8.5%
Asthenia--11.0%5.9%
Pain in extremity--11.0%10.2%
Dizziness--11.0%10.5%

Trial register Cetrorelix: 2 placebo-controlled trials; Leuprolide: 2. Each peptide is compared with placebo in its own trials, not with the other: a dash means the event is not in that peptide's top list. Cetrorelix side effects · Leuprolide side effects

LEGAL STATUS

Approval in each country read

CountryCetrorelixLeuprolideRegister
United StatesFDA-approvedFDA-approvedRegulator FDA
European UnionAuthorisedNot on the registerRegulator EMA
United KingdomAuthorisedAuthorisedRegulator MHRA
CanadaAuthorisedAuthorisedRegulator Health Canada
AustraliaRegisteredStatus unknownRegulator TGA
SwitzerlandAuthorisedAuthorisedRegulator Swissmedic
BrazilRegistadoRegistadoRegulator ANVISA
SerbiaAuthorisedAuthorisedRegulator ALIMS
SingaporeRegisteredRegisteredRegulator HSA
TurkeyRuhsatliRuhsatliRegulator TITCK

HEAD TO HEAD

6 registered trials include both

NCT04094467Comparison Between Two Different Protocols in Polycystic Ovary Symdrome Women Undergoing Intra-cytoplasmic Injection
UNKNOWN · updated 2020-03-25
NCT01669291Effect of GnRH Antagonist vs Agonist Long on IVF Outcome, Peak Estradiol Level,and Duration of Stimulation
COMPLETED · updated 2014-06-04
NCT01948804The Comparison of Effect of Four Different Treatment Protocols on IVF Outcomes in Poor Responders Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization.
UNKNOWN · updated 2014-01-15
NCT00883766Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A Comparison Between Standard Long Protocol Versus an Antagonist Protocol Starting on Day 1
TERMINATED · updated 2012-07-20
NCT01595334Study on Influence of Leutinizing Hormone (LH) on Oocyte Maturity
UNKNOWN · updated 2012-05-25
NCT00505817GnRH Agonist and Antagonists in an Oocyte Donation Program
COMPLETED · updated 2009-01-12

Values reproduce public registers on the dates shown. This comparison states no view on which compound is preferable, safer or more effective. Not medical, legal or regulatory advice.

WEEKLY

Register Watch, weekly

New trials, approvals and enforcement actions. One email a week.