COMPARISON
CJC-1295 vs Teduglutide
5 attributes held for at least one of the two. 5 differ. Each value carries the register it came from and the date that register was read.
Answer
CJC-1295 is authorised or registered in 0 and Teduglutide in 7 of the 10 registers read. CJC-1295: No trial states a phase. Teduglutide: highest phase Phase 4 (after approval). 0 registered trials include both.
States no view on which is preferable, safer or more effective. Not medical advice.
| CJC-1295 | Teduglutide | |
|---|---|---|
| Registered trials differs | 1 clinicaltrials.gov · 2026-10-03 | 51 clinicaltrials.gov · 2026-10-03 |
| FDA label differs | Not checked no record of "fdaLabel" for cjc-1295 | FDA-approved: Gattex openfda · 2026-10-03T17:23:44.062Z |
| EU authorisation differs | Nothing on record ema read 2026-08-31 | Authorised ema · 2026-10-03 |
| EU authorised on differs | Not checked no record of "authorisedOn" for cjc-1295 | 2012-08-30 ema · 2026-10-03 |
| ATC code differs | Not checked no record of "atcCode" for cjc-1295 | A16AX08 ema · 2026-10-03 |
SIDE EFFECTS
Most common side effects, each beside its own placebo
| Side effect | CJC-1295 | placebo | Teduglutide | placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | - | - | 31.0% | 23.3% |
| Nausea | - | - | 28.6% | 18.6% |
| Gastrointestinal stoma complication | - | - | 23.8% | 7.0% |
| Abdominal distension | - | - | 21.4% | 2.3% |
| Central line systemic infections | - | - | 16.7% | 16.3% |
| Edema peripheral | - | - | 16.7% | 4.7% |
| Urinary tract infection | - | - | 14.3% | 9.3% |
| Flatulence | - | - | 11.9% | 7.0% |
| Vomiting | - | - | 11.9% | 9.3% |
| Catheter-related infection | - | - | 11.9% | 2.3% |
Trial register CJC-1295: 0 placebo-controlled trials; Teduglutide: 1. Each peptide is compared with placebo in its own trials, not with the other: a dash means the event is not in that peptide's top list. CJC-1295 side effects · Teduglutide side effects
LEGAL STATUS
Approval in each country read
| Country | CJC-1295 | Teduglutide | Register |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Not on the register | FDA-approved | Regulator FDA |
| European Union | Not on the register | Authorised | Regulator EMA |
| United Kingdom | Not on the register | Authorised | Regulator MHRA |
| Canada | Not on the register | Authorised | Regulator Health Canada |
| Australia | Status unknown | Registered | TGA |
| Switzerland | Not on the register | Authorised | Regulator Swissmedic |
| Brazil | Not on the register | Registado | Regulator ANVISA |
| Serbia | Not on the register | Not on the register | Regulator ALIMS |
| Singapore | Not on the register | Not on the register | Regulator HSA |
| Turkey | Not on the register | Not on the register | Regulator TITCK |
Values reproduce public registers on the dates shown. This comparison states no view on which compound is preferable, safer or more effective. Not medical, legal or regulatory advice.
WEEKLY
Register Watch, weekly
New trials, approvals and enforcement actions. One email a week.